Cannabis consumption patterns in Europe

with No Comments
Based on the most recent European surveys, cannabis use in the past year among the EU population aged 15 to 34 is estimated at 15.1% (15.3 million individuals). Considering that men are generally twice as likely to report consumption as women, it is unsurprising that these figures may be slightly higher when accounting for this potential reporting bias.
Among young people aged 15 to 24, it is estimated that 18.2% (8.6 million) used cannabis in the past year, while 9.6% (4.5 million) reported use in the past month.
Approximately 1.3% (3.7 million) of adults aged 15 to 64 are daily or near-daily cannabis users, defined as consumption on 20 or more days within the last month.
Within the 15–34 age group, an estimated 2.0% (2 million) use cannabis on a daily or near-daily basis. Roughly three-quarters of adult users (aged 15 to 64) are men, and the majority (54%) are under the age of 35.
National trends in cannabis use vary. Among the countries that have conducted surveys since 2021 and reported results, three recorded higher estimates, eight remained stable, and two reported lower estimates compared with their previous comparable surveys.
The 2021 European Web Survey on Drugs indicated that 95% of respondents who had used cannabis in the preceding 12 months consumed cannabis herb, compared with 32% who used resin, 25% who consumed edibles, and 17% who used extracts.
The consumption data presented in the following chart are based on general population surveys submitted to the European Drugs Agency (EUDA) by national focal points and are drawn from studies conducted between 2013 and 2023.
Clicking on the map will open a new browser window with a data explorer that will allow us to view detailed consumption data by reference period and age range, or we can also access data broken down by country by clicking on the map or selecting a country from the drop-down menu.

Cannabis Residues in Wastewater from Selected European Cities: Latest Data

It is noteworthy that in 2023, among the 51 cities with comparable data, 20 reported an annual increase in the cannabis metabolite THC-COOH detected in wastewater samples, while 15 reported a decrease.
The following chart displays the average daily quantities of THC-COOH, measured in milligrams per 1,000 inhabitants. In most cities, sampling was carried out over a one-week period between March and May 2023.
Red circles indicate an increase compared with previous values; yellow circles indicate stable levels; blue circles reflect a decrease; and grey circles represent current values that cannot be compared due to the absence of prior data.
The table below presents the 2024 values for the cannabis metabolite, distinguishing between weekday and weekend averages, for the 80 European cities for which validated data are available.
CountryCityWeekend meanDaily meanCountry: City
ATGraz70.1466.17AT: Graz
ATHall-Wattens50.5749.73AT: Hall-Wattens
ATInnsbruck79.8579.05AT: Innsbruck
ATKapfenberg56.2453.46AT: Kapfenberg
ATKlagenfurt46.642.84AT: Klagenfurt
ATKnittelfeld38.0339,00AT: Knittelfeld
ATKufstein70.0974.09AT: Kufstein
ATPurgstall41.4738.52AT: Purgstall
ATRegion Millstättersee26.1725.8AT: Region Millstättersee
ATRied im Innkreis59.0358.15AT: Ried im Innkreis
ATSalzburg51.7650.76AT: Salzburg
ATSteyr77.3361.54AT: Steyr
ATStrass im Zillertal33.1931.97AT: Strass im Zillertal
ATWasserverband Hofsteig56.5355.86AT: Wasserverband Hofsteig
ATWien84.4287.34AT: Wien
ATWiener Neustadt55.2855.94AT: Wiener Neustadt
ATWildon33.2731.32AT: Wildon
CHBasel35.730.7CH: Basel
CHBerne50.8347.01CH: Berne
CHGeneva150.34145.37CH: Geneva
CHZurich92.2687.59CH: Zurich
CZBrno69.1972.31CZ: Brno
CZČeské Budějovice117.65118.02CZ: České Budějovice
CZKarlovy Vary69.2971.97CZ: Karlovy Vary
CZOstrava65.6461.53CZ: Ostrava
CZPlzeň104.9105.41CZ: Plzeň
CZPrague (2)83.380.35CZ: Prague (2)
CZÚstí nad Labem48.5247.72CZ: Ústí nad Labem
DKAalborg104.5690.62DK: Aalborg
DKAarhus67.8665.53DK: Aarhus
DKCopenhagen122.69123.35DK: Copenhagen
DKEsbjerg103.88111.19DK: Esbjerg
DKNæstved95.6993.55DK: Næstved
DKOdense77.278.41DK: Odense
ESBarcelona218.03220.68ES: Barcelona
ESCastellon65.0365.04ES: Castellon
ESLleida117.23121.31ES: Lleida
ESSantiago54.5954.32ES: Santiago
ESTarragona238.06228.9ES: Tarragona
FRParis Seine Centre55.153.88FR: Paris Seine Centre
GRAthens34.7536.9GR: Athens
HRSplit4.444.93HR: Split
HRZagreb94.0188.8HR: Zagreb
HUBudapest52.7956.78HU: Budapest
IEDublin96.0298.1IE: Dublin
ISReykjavik Klettagarðar60.3955.12IS: Reykjavik Klettagarðar
ITBologna80.8782.04IT: Bologna
ITBozen53.5252.72IT: Bozen
ITMilan49.8552.28IT: Milan
ITRome77.8978.77IT: Rome
LULuxembourg117.87140.4LU: Luxembourg
NLAmsterdam284.09319.46NL: Amsterdam
NLEindhoven118.87124.64NL: Eindhoven
NLGroningen253.95258.08NL: Groningen
NLRotterdam (2)143.12147.99NL: Rotterdam (2)
NLUtrecht112.05122.44NL: Utrecht
NLZwolle101.6898.16NL: Zwolle
NOBergen (2)123.29132.72NO: Bergen (2)
NOOslo (2)167.29163.11NO: Oslo (2)
NOTrondheim (2)109.27110.78NO: Trondheim (2)
PLKrakow P39.9241.68PL: Krakow P
PTAlmada114.06119.1PT: Almada
PTLisbon136.37150.83PT: Lisbon
PTPorto56.4453.74PT: Porto
SEGävle42.0144.8SE: Gävle
SEKarlstad37.3436.84SE: Karlstad
SEStockholm (2)57.457.61SE: Stockholm (2)
SETrollhättan52.2849.74SE: Trollhättan
SEVäxjö47.1346.85SE: Växjö
SIDomžale-Kamnik48.0846.61SI: Domžale-Kamnik
SIKoper75.7381.88SI: Koper
SIKranj46,0045.65SI: Kranj
SILjubljana84.1690.21SI: Ljubljana
SIMaribor75.6564.97SI: Maribor
SINovo mesto33.1536.84SI: Novo mesto
SIVelenje65.4468.18SI: Velenje
SKBratislava C58.758.46SK: Bratislava C
SKPiestany49.7752.34SK: Piestany
TRAnkara17.0416.86TR: Ankara
TRIstanbul (II-VII)16.2316.52TR: Istanbul (II-VII)
As observed in the table, it is notable that no data are available for countries such as Germany or Belgium, nor for cities such as Madrid—the capital of Spain and the most populous urban area on the Iberian Peninsula.
With regard to Madrid, this absence of data is somewhat striking. It remains unclear whether this may be attributed to a lack of initiative or interest on the part of municipal and regional authorities—governed by the Partido Popular—or simply to administrative shortcomings, as suggested by recent issues such as the Valencia DANA management, the forest fires in Castilla y León, or the breast cancer screening programme deficiencies in Andalusia.
Barcelona, by contrast, does appear among the European cities with validated data, presenting notably high values that position it among the leading cities in the ranking—results which, from the perspective of cannabis advocates, are particularly gratifying 😊.